Repository for Oil and Gas Energy Research (ROGER)

The Repository for Oil and Gas Energy Research, or ROGER, is a near-exhaustive collection of bibliographic information, abstracts, and links to many of journal articles that pertain to shale and tight gas development. The goal of this project is to create a single repository for unconventional oil and gas-related research as a resource for academic, scientific, and citizen researchers.

ROGER currently includes 2303 studies.
Last updated: September 01, 2024

ROGER

Search ROGER

Use keywords or categories (e.g., air quality, climate, health) to identify peer-reviewed studies and view study abstracts.

Deciphering the true life cycle environmental impacts and costs of the mega-scale shale gas-to-olefins projects in the United States
Chang He and Fengqi You, February 2016
Environmental contamination due to shale gas development
Annevelink et al., February 2016
Response to “Discourse over a contested technology on Twitter: A case study of hydraulic fracturing”—Word choice as political speech
Emily Grubert, January 2016
Environmental pollution by chemical substances used in the shale gas extraction—a review
Rajmund Michalski and Alina Ficek, January 2016
Shale gas in North America and Europe
Michael H. Stephenson, January 2016
A conceptual model of the socioeconomic impacts of unconventional fossil fuel extraction
Measham et al., January 2016
Potential environmental impacts of ‘fracking’ in the UK
Staddon et al., January 1970
What is the fracking story in Canada?
Andrea Olive, January 1970
Framing Shale Gas for Policy-Making in Poland
Aleksandra Lis and Piotr Stankiewicz, September 2024
Just fracking: a distributive environmental justice analysis of unconventional gas development in Pennsylvania, USA
Emily Clough and Derek Bell, September 2024
Sustainable Development versus Prospecting and Extraction of Shale Gas
Duda et al., September 2024
Environmental Impact of Exploration from Unconventional Gas Deposits in Poland
Jan Macuda and Monika Konieczyńska, September 2024
UK public perceptions of shale gas hydraulic fracturing: The role of audience, message and contextual factors on risk perceptions and policy support
Whitmarsh et al., December 2015
Fractured knowledge: Mapping the gaps in public and private water monitoring efforts in areas affected by shale gas development
Kinchy et al., December 2015
Environmental impacts of hydraulic fracturing in shale gas development in the United States
Dongxiao Zhang and Tingyun Yang, December 2015
Uncertainty in the Shale Gas Debate: Views From the Science–Policymaking Interface
Profiroiu et al., October 2015
Unconventional natural gas development and human health: thoughts from the United States
Finkel et al., October 2015
Unconventional Gas Development in the USA: Exploring the Risk Perception Issues
Graham et al., October 2015
Potential of hydraulically induced fractures to communicate with existing wellbores
James A. Montague and George F. Pinder, October 2015
Hydraulic fracturing – Integrating public participation with an independent review of the risks and benefits
Wheeler et al., October 2015
Policy recommendations to promote shale gas development in China based on a technical and economic evaluation
Yuan et al., October 2015
The current situation of shale gas in Sichuan, China
Zhao Xin-gang and Yang Ya-hui, October 2015
Can the circle be squared? An enquiry into shale gas mining in South Africa's Karoo
Mark Ingle and Doreen Atkinson, September 2015
Stakeholder perspectives on shale gas fracking: a Q-method study of environmental discourses
Cotton Matthew, September 2015
Differences in Public Perceptions and Leaders’ Perceptions on Hydraulic Fracturing and Shale Development
Crowe et al., September 2015
The productivity and potential future recovery of the Bakken formation of North Dakota
M. Scott McNally and Adam R. Brandt, September 2015
Scenarios for shale gas development and their related land use impacts in the Baltic Basin, Northern Poland
Baranzelli et al., September 2015
Synergies and Tradeoffs Among Environmental Impacts Under Conservation Planning of Shale Gas Surface Infrastructure
Milt et al., August 2015
Spatial and temporal characteristics of historical oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania: implications for new shale gas resources.
Dilmore et al., August 2015
Policy Decisions on Shale Gas Development ('Fracking'): The Insufficiency of Science and Necessity of Moral Thought
Darrick Trent Evensen, August 2015
Transportation Activities Associated with High-Volume Hydraulic Fracturing Operations in the Marcellus Shale Formation
Korfmacher et al., August 2015
Hydraulic fracturing (fracking) and the clean air act
Evans et al., August 2015
Energy Technology Assessment of Shale Gas ‘Fracking’ – A UK Perspective
Hammond et al., August 2015
Contested Technologies and Design for Values: The Case of Shale Gas
Dignum et al., July 2015
Framing ‘fracking’: Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom
Williams et al., July 2015
Selling “Fracking”: Energy in Depth and the Marcellus Shale
Jacob Matz and Daniel Renfrew, July 2015
Frac Sand Mines Are Preferentially Sited in Unzoned Rural Areas
Christina Locke, July 2015
Shale Gas Supply Chain Design and Operations toward Better Economic and Life Cycle Environmental Performance: MINLP Model and Global Optimization Algorithm
Jiyao Gao and Fengqi You, July 2015
Eliciting public concerns about an emerging energy technology: The case of unconventional shale gas development in the United States
Israel et al., July 2015
Landscape Disturbance from Unconventional and Conventional Oil and Gas Development in the Marcellus Shale Region of Pennsylvania, USA
E. Terrence Slonecker and Lesley E. Milheim, June 2015
Effect of Providing Information on Students' Knowledge and Concerns about Hydraulic Fracking
Burger et al., May 2015
Considerations for the development of shale gas in the United Kingdom
Hays et al., April 2015
Comment on “Modeling and prediction of natural gas fracking pad landscapes in the Marcellus Shale region, USA” by Qingming Meng
Wendy A. Klein and Alex K. Manda, April 2015
Data inconsistencies from states with unconventional oil and gas activity
Malone et al., March 2015
Current perspectives on unconventional shale gas extraction in the Appalachian Basin
David J. Lampe, March 2015
Selective perceptions of hydraulic fracturing
Sarge et al., March 2015
Ripple Effects of the Shale Gas Boom in the U.S.: Shift in the Balance of Energy Resources, Technology Deployment, Climate Policies, Energy Markets, Geopolitics and Policy Development
Ghazale Haddadian and Mohammad Shahidehpour, March 2015
Drinking water while fracking: now and in the future
Susan L. Brantley, January 1970
Natural resource development for science, technology, and environmental policy issues: the case of hydraulic fracturing
Ravi Jain, January 2015
Evaluation of socioeconomic impacts on and risks for shale gas exploration in China
Shiwei Yu, January 2015

Sign up for email updates!

Join our email list to learn about our latest research, analysis, and events.

Sign up for email updates!

Join our email list to learn about our latest research, analysis, and events.

Sign up for email updates!

Join our email list to learn about our latest research, analysis, and events.

Sign up for email updates!

Join our email list to learn about our latest research, analysis, and events.

Pin It on Pinterest

SIGN UP FOR EMAILS
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut