Repository for Oil and Gas Energy Research (ROGER)

The Repository for Oil and Gas Energy Research, or ROGER, is a near-exhaustive collection of bibliographic information, abstracts, and links to many of journal articles that pertain to shale and tight gas development. The goal of this project is to create a single repository for unconventional oil and gas-related research as a resource for academic, scientific, and citizen researchers.

ROGER currently includes 2303 studies.
Last updated: July 26, 2024

ROGER

Search ROGER

Use keywords or categories (e.g., air quality, climate, health) to identify peer-reviewed studies and view study abstracts.

Radioactive elements in natural gas: a case study on distribution of gaseous 222radon and its origin mechanism
Luo et al., September 2012
Effect of biogas generation on radon emissions from landfills receiving radium-bearing waste from shale gas development
Walter et al., September 2012
Preserving health in the Marcellus region
Ruth McDermott-Levy and Nina Kaktins, September 2012
The effects of a natural gas boom on employment and income in Colorado, Texas, and Wyoming
Jeremy G. Weber, September 2012
Fracture stimulation fundamentals
Larry Britt, September 2012
Two-year survey comparing earthquake activity and injection-well locations in the Barnett Shale, Texas
Cliff Frohlich, August 2012
Chemical characteristics of Marcellus Shale flowback water in Pennsylvania
Elise Barbot and Radisav D. Vidic, August 2012
The potential near-source ozone impacts of upstream oil and gas industry emissions
Eduardo P Olaguer, August 2012
Water pollution risk associated with natural gas extraction from the Marcellus Shale
Daniel J Rozell and Sheldon J Reaven, August 2012
Environmental health advocacy: an overview of natural gas drilling in northeast Pennsylvania and implications for pediatric nursing
Lori S Lauver, August 2012
Gas versus oil prices the impact of shale gas
Asche et al., August 2012
Geochemical evidence for possible natural migration of Marcellus Formation brine to shallow aquifers in Pennsylvania
Warner et al., July 2012
Fracking vs Faucets: Balancing Energy Needs and Water Sustainability at Urban Frontiers
Fry et al., July 2012
Venting and leaking of methane from shale gas development: response to Cathles et al.
Howarth et al., July 2012
A commentary on “The greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas in shale formations” by R.W. Howarth, R. Santoro, and Anthony Ingraffea
Cathles et al., July 2012
The Future of Fracking: New Rules Target Air Emissions for Cleaner Natural Gas Production
Bob Weinhold, July 2012
A critical assessment of the efficacy of biocides used during the hydraulic fracturing process in shale natural gas wells
Struchtemeyer et al., July 2012
“Greenwashing gas: Might a ‘transition fuel’ label legitimize carbon-intensive natural gas development?”
Stephenson et al., July 2012
Four-compartment partition model of hazardous components in hydraulic fracturing fluid additives
Alison Aminto and Mira Stone Olson, July 2012
Development, Land Use, and Collective Trauma: The Marcellus Shale Gas Boom in Rural Pennsylvania
Simona L. Perry, June 2012
Environmental pathways of potential impacts to human health from oil and gas development in northeast British Columbia, Canada
Judi Krzyzanowski, June 2012
Assessing the greenhouse impact of natural gas
L.M. Cathles, June 2012
Life Cycle Carbon Footprint of Shale Gas: Review of Evidence and Implications
Christopher L. Weber and Christopher Clavin, June 2012
Effect of Gas Flaring on Lung Function among Residents in Gas Flaring Community in Delta State, Nigeria
Ovuakporaye et al., May 2012
Shale gas and hydrofracturing
Jerald L Schnoor, May 2012
Human health risk assessment of air emissions from development of unconventional natural gas resources
McKenzie et al., May 2012
Early Trends in Landcover Change and Forest Fragmentation Due to Shale-Gas Development in Pennsylvania: A Potential Outcome for the Northcentral Appalachians
Drohan et al., May 2012
The Interdependence of Electricity and Natural Gas: Current Factors and Future Prospects
Paul J. Hibbard and Todd Schatzki, May 2012
An unconventional mindset for shale gas surface facilities
Guarnone et al., May 2012
Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure
Alvarez et al., April 2012
Potential Restrictions for CO2 Sequestration Sites Due to Shale and Tight Gas Production
T. R. Elliot and M. A. Celia, April 2012
Missing from the Table: Role of the Environmental Public Health Community in Governmental Advisory Commissions Related to Marcellus Shale Drilling
Goldstein et al., April 2012
Water Use for Shale-Gas Production in Texas, US
Jean-Philippe Nicot and Bridget R. Scanlon, March 2012
Implications of the Recent Reductions in Natural Gas Prices for Emissions of CO2 from the US Power Sector
Lu et al., March 2012
Fracking and the Neoliberalization of the Hydro-Social Cycle in Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale
Michael H. Finewood and Laura J. Stroup, March 2012
Factors affecting the variability of stray gas concentration and composition in groundwater
Anthony W. Gorody, March 2012
Toward strategic management of shale gas development: Regional, collective impacts on water resources
Brian G. Rahm and Susan J. Riha, March 2012
Transport properties of unconventional gas systems
Amann-Hildenbrand et al., March 2012
Human-mediated shifts in animal habitat use: Sequential changes in pronghorn use of a natural gas field in Greater Yellowstone
Beckmann et al., March 2012
How the technical differences between shale gas and conventional gas projects lead to a new business model being required to be successful
Michael Binnion, March 2012
Modeling the implications of expanded US shale gas production
Kenneth Barry Medlock III, March 2012
UK shale gas: The story so far
Richard C. Selley, March 2012
Hydrocarbon emissions characterization in the Colorado Front Range: A pilot study
Pétron et al., February 2012
Greenhouse gases, climate change and the transition from coal to low-carbon electricity
N. P. Myhrvold and K. Caldeira, February 2012
Profitability assessment of Haynesville shale gas wells
Mark J. Kaiser, February 2012
Haynesville shale play economic analysis
Mark J. Kaiser, February 2012
Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Shale Gas, Natural Gas, Coal, and Petroleum
Burnham et al., January 2012
Unconventional Bridges over Troubled Water - Lessons to Be Learned from the Canadian Oil Sands as the United States Moves to Develop the Natural Gas of the Marcellus Shale Play
Cameron Jefferies, January 2012
Is Shale Gas Good for Climate Change?
Daniel P. Schrag, January 1970
Impacts of gas drilling on human and animal health
Michelle Bamberger and Robert E. Oswald, July 2024

Sign up for email updates!

Join our email list to learn about our latest research, analysis, and events.

Sign up for email updates!

Join our email list to learn about our latest research, analysis, and events.

Sign up for email updates!

Join our email list to learn about our latest research, analysis, and events.

Sign up for email updates!

Join our email list to learn about our latest research, analysis, and events.

Pin It on Pinterest

SIGN UP FOR EMAILS
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut