Repository for Oil and Gas Energy Research (ROGER)

The Repository for Oil and Gas Energy Research, or ROGER, is a near-exhaustive collection of bibliographic information, abstracts, and links to many of journal articles that pertain to shale and tight gas development. The goal of this project is to create a single repository for unconventional oil and gas-related research as a resource for academic, scientific, and citizen researchers.

ROGER currently includes 2303 studies.
Last updated: November 23, 2024

ROGER

Search ROGER

Use keywords or categories (e.g., air quality, climate, health) to identify peer-reviewed studies and view study abstracts.

A Geographic Model to Assess and Limit Cumulative Ecological Degradation from Marcellus Shale Exploitation in New York, USA
John B. Davis and George R. Robinson, November 2024
Environmental Reviews and Case Studies: Addressing the Societal Costs of Unconventional Oil and Gas Exploration and Production: A Framework for Evaluating Short-Term, Future, and Cumulative Risks and Uncertainties of Hydrofracking
Simona L. Perry, November 2024
Modeling the Relative GHG Emissions of Conventional and Shale Gas Production
Stephenson et al., December 2011
The greenhouse impact of unconventional gas for electricity generation
Hultman et al., December 2011
Reducing the greenhouse gas footprint of shale gas
Wang et al., December 2011
The Hidden Factors That Make Wind Energy Cheaper than Natural Gas in the United States
Donald McCubbin and Benjamin K. Sovacool, November 2011
Economic Incentives and Regulatory Framework for Shale Gas Well Site Reclamation in Pennsylvania
Austin L. Mitchell and Elizabeth A. Casman, October 2011
Rapid expansion of natural gas development poses a threat to surface waters
Entrekin et al., October 2011
Natural gas: Should fracking stop?
Howarth et al., September 2011
Hydraulic fracturing not responsible for methane migration
Samuel C. Schon, September 2011
Lack of data to support a relationship between methane contamination of drinking water wells and hydraulic fracturing
Tarek Saba and Mark Orzechowski, September 2011
Natural Gas Operations from a Public Health Perspective
Colborn et al., September 2011
Chemical and physical characterization of produced waters from conventional and unconventional fossil fuel resources
Alley et al., September 2011
Coal to gas: the influence of methane leakage
Tom M. L. Wigley, August 2011
Uncertainty in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from United States natural gas end-uses and its effects on policy
Venkatesh et al., August 2011
Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of Marcellus shale gas
Jiang et al., August 2011
Blind Rush? Shale Gas Boom Proceeds Amid Human Health Questions
Charles W. Schmidt, August 2011
Influence of the Drilling Mud Formulation Process on the Bacterial Communities in Thermogenic Natural Gas Wells of the Barnett Shale
Struchtemeyer et al., July 2011
Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations
Howarth et al., June 2011
Water Management Challenges Associated with the Production of Shale Gas by Hydraulic Fracturing
Gregory et al., June 2011
Effects of Disturbance Associated with Natural Gas Extraction on the Occurrence of Three Grassland Songbirds
Hamilton et al., June 2011
Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing
Osborn et al., May 2011
The economic impact of shale gas extraction: A review of existing studies
Thomas C. Kinnaman, May 2011
Landscape patterns of avian habitat use and nest success are affected by chronic gas well compressor noise
Francis et al., May 2011
Energy development affects populations of sagebrush songbirds in Wyoming
Michelle M. Gilbert and Anna D. Chalfoun, May 2011
Regulating hydraulic fracturing in shale gas plays: The case of Texas
Dianne Rahm, May 2011
The rush to drill for natural gas: a public health cautionary tale
Madelon L Finkel and Adam Law, May 2011
Land application of hydrofracturing fluids damages a deciduous forest stand in West Virginia
Mary Beth Adams, April 2011
A critical evaluation of unconventional gas recovery from the marcellus shale, northeastern United States
Lee et al., April 2011
Drilling the Marcellus shale for natural gas: environmental health issues for nursing
Nina M Kaktins, March 2011
Shale gas comes into its own: at a cost
Tee L Guidotti, February 2011
Superfund to the rescue? Seeking potential CERCLA response authority and cost recovery liability for releases of hazardous substances resulting from hydraulic fracturing
Sean H Joyner, January 1970
Public Perception of Desalinated Produced Water From Oil and Gas Field Operations: A Replication
Theodori et al., November 2024
Radon in Natural Gas from Marcellus Shale
Marvin Resnikoff, November 2024
Natural Gas Landowner Coalitions in New York State: Emerging Benefits of Collective Natural Resource Management
Jeffrey Jacquet and Richard C. Stedman, November 2024
Residents' Perceptions of Community and Environmental Impacts from Development of Natural Gas in the Marcellus Shale: A Comparison of Pennsylvania and New York Cases
Braiser et al., November 2024
Explaining Residential Energy Consumption: A Focus on Location and Race Differences in Natural Gas Use
Lazarus Adua and Jeff S. Sharp, November 2024
A Thematic Analysis of Local Respondents' Perceptions of Barnett Shale Energy Development
Brooklynn J. Wynveen, November 2024
Ozone Impacts of Natural Gas Development in the Haynesville Shale
Kemball-Cook et al., December 2010
Carbon and hydrogen isotopic evidence for the origin of combustible gases in water-supply wells in north-central Pennsylvania
Révész et al., December 2010
Geological characteristics and resource potential of shale gas in China
Zou et al., December 2010
The Marcellus Shale: Resources and Reservations
Daniel J. Soeder, August 2010
Natural Gas Plays in the Marcellus Shale: Challenges and Potential Opportunities
Kargbo et al., August 2010
Chemical and isotopic tracers of the contribution of microbial gas in Devonian organic-rich shales and reservoir sandstones, northern Appalachian Basin
Stephen G. Osborn and Jennifer C. McIntosh, March 2010
Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment
Fakhru’l-Razi et al., October 2009
Mapping Oil and Gas Development Potential in the US Intermountain West and Estimating Impacts to Species
Copeland et al., October 2009
Regional impacts of oil and gas development on ozone formation in the western United States
Rodriguez et al., September 2009
Rapid photochemical production of ozone at high concentrations in a rural site during winter
Schnell et al., January 2009
Associations between in utero exposure to airborne emissions from oil and gas production and processing facilities and immune system outcomes in neonatal beef calves
Bechtel et al., January 1970
Associations between immune function in yearling beef cattle and airborne emissions of sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, and VOCs from oil and natural gas facilities
Bechtel et al., January 1970

Sign up for email updates!

Join our email list to learn about our latest research, analysis, and events.

Sign up for email updates!

Join our email list to learn about our latest research, analysis, and events.

Sign up for email updates!

Join our email list to learn about our latest research, analysis, and events.

Sign up for email updates!

Join our email list to learn about our latest research, analysis, and events.

Pin It on Pinterest

SIGN UP FOR EMAILS
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut